
The Shack is a wildly popular Christian fiction book by William Young. It’s currently number 3 on Amazon.com’s bestseller list. A lot of people have read it and so have I.
Here’s my initial take on it (I RECOMMEND READING THIS AFTER YOU’VE READ THE BOOK):
The Good:
I really liked the book. I would even say that I loved it. I thought it did some things very well. It helped my faith personally by demonstrating the trinitarian love in a real way. It also was a story of great redemption and hope – something we all need to read and remember sometimes. I thought it was creative and, although it surely made some people upset, I think it is good to break out of our sometimes limited views of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
The storyline was rough. I can’t imagine reading this after having kids. I know that has to be part of it’s draw. I also can see how Young can help a lot of people cope with difficult circumstances through Mack.
I also like how it’s written to make people think it was a real story relayed to him by a real person. Kindof, Blair Witch Project meets Left Behind.
Overall, I thought the book was really good. The Truth and creativity displayed was powerful and strengthening. For that reason, however, we have to have a conversation about what was not-so-true so that we don’t have to throw the baby [good parts of the book] out with the bath-water [by telling people not to read it at all].
The Shady:
You always have to be careful when you try to give an image to God. The second Commandment warns us not to make any images or idols to represent God and I think that Romans 1:21-23 shows the danger of doing that (we tend to worship the images that we create instead of worshipping a God who is much bigger than our imagination or ability to understand Him). Young does a great job of getting people to think more creatively about the nature of the Father, Son, and HS, but you just have to be careful.
The Bad:
1)There is one line where Young breaks from displaying a very sound representation of the trinity: “Papa” says, “I am truly human in Jesus.”
This is called Modalism and it is a common mistake (and even heresy) made in understanding the trinity. The belief that God is found in three forms like water (can be steam, ice and liquid) in the Father, Son and Spirit is wrong. Why is it important to understand: a couple of quick reasons. First, to understand Jesus’ sacrifice and pain and love on Earth, we have to understand him as the Son who came to be with us (not just another form of the Father). Second, to understand the community and submission found within the trinity, we have to see them as three distinct beings in One. (There are more and maybe I will write on them later).
There is plenty of evidence in The Shack where the trinity is displayed in the correct way, so I don’t really understand why Young threw that line in. However, it does bring up a good point for discussion (can you say book club?).
2) In another place the book says that there is no hierarchy among the trinity because that doesn’t make sense unless there is sin. This is not true. There is no sin within the trinity and there is hierarchy among the three. God sent the Son and the Son sent the Holy Spirit. Though they are equal in respects to their nature, they ultimately choose to be subservient to one another. Jesus makes statements like, “I only do what the Father tells me to do” and other statements in that respect.
When we miss this, we miss the fact that God can bring equality and submission at the same time. In fact, that’s not only a sign of Love, that may be one of it’s most distinguishing elements. That’s why so many of the commandments of the new testament have to do with submission and equality (churches to spiritual leadership, in marriages, to government officials, in Christian community). Our lack of understanding of this fact leads to all sorts of problems in those situations.
The Picky (SPOILER ALERT!**):
I thought the car crash at the end was a little unnecessary. It only lasted for 2 pages and didn’t really add anything to the plot but forced drama. I know that’s picky, but it’s my opinion.
Final thoughts about the controversy:
What is sad about the controversy around the book is that God has been portrayed as so distant and cold in so many churches that the thought of him engaging people’s senses in a very real, loving and special way has really upset some people. We should never forget that God’s love is one of “incarnation”. It is close, especially in difficult times like the one Mack was going through. AND none of us should be surprised if God’s physical nature is different than we thought when we stand before him.
Finally, this book is just further evidence that creative wrestling with who God is happens best in community, with an open Bible right in the middle.
Would love to hear all of your opinions too.
*UPDATE: